DATE: Tuesday, May 13, 2014
TIME: 4:00 p.m
PLACE: Lecture Hall, Lambert Road campus
CANDIDATE: Kim Charisse Colvin
DISSERTATION TITLE: "The Dream Poet’s Pen: A Matter of Archetypal Psychology"
PROGRAM-TRACK/YEAR: PhD-J; 2005
CHAIR: Dr. Joseph Coppin
READER: Dr. Matthew Green
EXTERNAL READER: Dr. Carl Leggo
Colvin, K. (2014). The Dream Poet’s Pen: A Matter of Archetypal Psychology (Doctoral dissertation, Pacifica Graduate Institute, 2014)
Poet David Ray imagines, “The poem is the altar for the dream” (1998, p. 176). This dissertation focuses on amplifying dreams with poetry from a collective perspective through the lens of archetypal psychology. The research was a collaborative effort of oneiric poetics nested in a dream group focused on engaging psychopoesis in relationship to archetypal value in dream images portraying the collective psyche and current cultural surround.
Hermeneutic phenomenology addressed the two central research questions: What are the dynamics that serve meaning making, or the transformation of meaning, when poetry is used to amplify dreams? How does this work develop further when engaged by a dream group aimed at collective meaning making? Phenomenological analysis described the essence of the lived experience of the co-researchers’ engagement with writing dream poetry, moving from raw dream text through archetypal amplifications and associations in the group setting, culminating in dream poetry. Hermeneutics examined the shifting horizons of imaginal awareness that emerged from the intersubjective field of the dream group and how these horizons, infused with archetypal sensitivity, altered the co-researchers’ subsequent relationship to the dream’s images when creating dream poetry.
The research revealed the importance of a tripartite approach to dream work that is aware of the literal, psychological, and archetypal dynamics of meaning making. Thirteen dynamics that serve meaning making emerged from this tripartite analysis. Key among these are: conservation of the dream image view shed; building a relationship with and expressing interest in the image; liberation of the imaginal ego; relativizing the day-world ego; archetypal empathy; expanded awareness through commonality of archetypal dream themes; cultural awareness through a group dialogic regarding collective dream themes; and archetypal themes condensed in dream poetry.
The research reimagined the conversation between depth psychology, poetics, and dreaming beyond the personal or day-world ego’s interpretations. This dissertation attends to the dream poet’s pen and, by doing so, revivifies the imaginal ego, rejuvenates the poetic basis of mind, and refreshes psychopoesis as meaning-making agents in depth psychology. In a valuable move for archetypal psychology, this dissertation enlists these three precious premises in service of the sensus communis.Please note: All oral defense attendees must shuttle to the Lambert Road campus from the Best Western Hotel in Carpinteria. Parking on campus is not available.